Deciphering of Adult Glioma Vulnerabilities through Expression Pattern Analysis of GABA, Glutamate and Calcium Neurotransmitter Genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adult infiltrating gliomas are highly aggressive tumors of the central nervous system with a dismal prognosis despite intensive multimodal therapy (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy). In this study, we studied the expression, methylation and interacting miRNA profiles of GABA-, glutamate- and calcium-related genes in 661 adult infiltrating gliomas available through the TCGA database. Neurotransmitter-based unsupervised clustering identified three established glioma molecular subgroups that parallel major World Health Organization glioma subclasses (IDH-wildtype astrocytomas, IDH-mutant astrocytomas, IDH-mutant oligodendroglioma). In addition, this analysis also defined a novel, neurotransmitter-related glioma subgroup (NT-1), mostly comprised of IDH-mutated gliomas and characterized by the overexpression of neurotransmitter-related genes. Lower expression of neurotransmission-related genes was correlated with increased aggressivity in hypomethylated IDH-wildtype tumors. There were also significant differences in the composition of the tumor inflammatory microenvironment between neurotransmission-based tumor categories, with lower estimated pools of M2-phenotype macrophages in NT-1 gliomas. This multi-omics analysis of the neurotransmission expression landscape of TCGA gliomas-which highlights the existence of neurotransmission-based glioma categories with different expression, epigenetic and inflammatory profiles-supports the existence of operational neurotransmitter signaling pathways in adult gliomas. These findings could shed new light on potential vulnerabilities to exploit in future glioma-targeting drug therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".