MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224059796 · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100250

Adhesion response of filopodia to an AFM lateral detachment force and functional changes after centrifugation of cells grown on nanoporous titanium

2022· article· en· W4224059796 on OpenAlexafffund
Dainelys Guadarrama Bello, Patricia Moraille, Serine Boughari, Antonella Badia, Antonio Nanci

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Today Bio · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRéseau de Recherche en Santé Buccodentaire et Osseuse
KeywordsFilopodiaAdhesionMaterials sciencePseudopodiaNanotechnologyCell adhesionNanotopographyBiophysicsChemistryCellBiologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cells sense and respond to mechanical cues from the surrounding substrate through filopodia. Regulation of cellular biomechanics operates at the nanoscale. Therefore, a better understanding of the relationship between filopodia and nanoscale surface features is highly relevant for the rational design of implant surfaces. The objective of this work was to determine the biomechanical contribution of filopodia and their nanoprotrusions to the adhesive interaction of cells with nanostructured surfaces. We have also analyzed the functional changes of entire cells subjected to an external force. MC3T3-E1 osteogenic cells were cultured on polished (Ti-Control) and nanotextured titanium discs (Ti-Nano). An AFM approach was used to measure the lateral detachment force of filopodia. Filopodia on Ti-Nano exhibited higher resistance to a lateral detachment force, which indicates that they adhere to the surface with more strength. SEM analysis revealed a restructuration of the cell membrane in response to centrifugation, being more evident on Ti-Nano. Fluorescence labeling also highlighted a difference in the mitochondrial footprint, a cellular compartment that provides energy for cellular processes. Together, these results show for the first time that surface topography can change the adhesive interaction of a subcellular structure that is fundamental in sensing physico-chemical surfaces features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Today BioSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207