MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4224062860 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5632

Dissecting the Different Components of the Modest Accretion Bursts of the Very Young Protostar HOPS 373

2022· article· en· W4224062860 on OpenAlexafffund
Sung-Yong Yoon, Gregory J. Herczeg, Jeong‐Eun Lee, Ho-Gyu Lee, Doug Johnstone, W. P. Varricatt, John Tobin, Carlos Contreras Peña, Steve Mairs, K. W. Hodapp, P. Manoj, Mayra Osorio, S. T. Megeath

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaNational Institutes of Natural SciencesMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e ComunicaçõesNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNational Research Foundation of KoreaChinese Academy of SciencesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyAcademia SinicaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Science CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrophysicsOutflowProtostarPhysicsBrightnessAccretion (finance)Emission spectrumAstronomyInfraredBipolar outflowStar formationSpectral lineGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Observed changes in protostellar brightness can be complicated to interpret. In our James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) Transient Monitoring Survey, we discovered that a young binary protostar, HOPS 373, is undergoing a modest 30% brightness increase at 850 μm, caused by a factor of 1.8–3.3 enhancement in the accretion rate. The initial burst occurred over a few months, with a sharp rise and then a shallower decay. A second rise occurred soon after the decay, and the source is still bright one year later. The mid-IR emission, the small-scale CO outflow mapped with ALMA, and the location of variable maser emission indicate that the variability is associated with the SW component. The near-IR and NEOWISE W1 and W2 emission is located along the blueshifted CO outflow, spatially offset by ∼3 to 4″ from the SW component. The K-band emission imaged by UKIRT shows a compact H2 emission source at the edge of the outflow, with a tail tracing the outflow back to the source. The W1 emission, likely dominated by scattered light, brightens by 0.7 mag, consistent with expectations based on the submillimeter light curve. The signal of continuum variability in K band and W2 is masked by stable H2 emission, as seen in our Gemini/GNIRS spectrum, and perhaps by CO emission. These differences in emission sources complicate IR searches for variability of the youngest protostars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→