Pre-Existing Frailty is Unrelated to Progression of Diffuse Subcortical Damage of Vascular Origin: A Longitudinal Prospective Study in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Both frailty and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin are associated with enhanced expression of inflammatory biomarkers. Therefore, it is possible that pre-existing frailty predisposes to WMH progression. However, this relationship has not been explored. This population-based longitudinal prospective study aimed to assess the impact of frailty on subsequent progression of WMH in community-dwelling older adults living in rural Ecuador. Methods: Participants of the Atahualpa Project Cohort received baseline frailty assessment and brain MRIs. Frailty was evaluated by means of the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS). WMH were graded according to the modified Fazekas scale. Individuals who received a follow-up brain MRI were included. Poisson regression models were fitted to assess the differential rate of WMH progression according to EFS score, after adjusting for demographics, level of education, and cardiovascular risk factors. Results: The study included 263 individuals aged ≥60 years (mean age: 65.7 ± 6.2 years; 57% women). The mean EFS score at baseline was 4 ± 2.3 points. Follow-up MRIs after a median follow-up of 6.5 years showed WMH progression in 103 (39%) individuals. The EFS score at baseline was associated with WMH progression in unadjusted analysis ( P = .006). However, significance was not achieved in a multivariate Poisson regression model adjusted for relevant covariates (IRR: 1.07; 95% C.I.: 0.97-1.18; P = .192). Conclusions: Study results do not support an independent relationship between frailty and WMH progression, adjusting for the confounding effect of aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".