Automatic quantification of perivascular spaces in T2-weighted images at 7 T MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perivascular spaces (PVS) are believed to be involved in brain waste disposal. PVS are associated with cerebral small vessel disease. At higher field strengths more PVS can be observed, challenging manual assessment. We developed a method to automatically detect and quantify PVS. A machine learning approach identified PVS in an automatically positioned ROI in the centrum semiovale (CSO), based on -resolution T2-weighted TSE scans. Next, 3D PVS tracking was performed in 50 subjects (mean age 62.9 years (range 27-78), 19 male), and quantitative measures were extracted. Maps of PVS density, length, and tortuosity were created. Manual PVS annotations were available to train and validate the automatic method. Good correlation was found between the automatic and manual PVS count: ICC (absolute/consistency) is 0.64/0.75, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) is 0.61. The automatic method counts fewer PVS than the manual count, because it ignores the smallest PVS (length <2 mm). For 20 subjects manual PVS annotations of a second observer were available. Compared with the correlation between the automatic and manual PVS, higher inter-observer ICC was observed (0.85/0.88), but DSC was lower (0.49 in 4 persons). Longer PVS are observed posterior in the CSO compared with anterior in the CSO. Higher PVS tortuosity are observed in the center of the CSO compared with the periphery of the CSO. Our fully automatic method can detect PVS in a 2D slab in the CSO, and extract quantitative PVS parameters by performing 3D tracking. This method enables automated quantitative analysis of PVS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".