Performance evaluation of cold in-place recycling materials through a simple semi-circular bending test
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cold in-place recycling (CIR) is a method of recycling existing Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) pavements. In this study, a new performance-based test method, called Fracture Index Value for Energy (FIVE), is developed to capture the fracture energy of the CIR materials. Furthermore, various stabilisation agents were used including engineered emulsion (EE), high float asphalt emulsion (HFMS-2s), commodity asphalt emulsion (CSS-1) and foamed asphalt. The FIVE test was first validated using disk-shaped compact tension (DCT) test and then was implemented on the study mixtures at their optimum stabilisation agent contents. The ranking of the mixtures and reproducibility of the FIVE test was proved to be true through inter-lab comparisons of the test results between two independent testing laboratories. The statistical testing results postulate that the FIVE test is a simple test method that is capable of characterising the cracking performance of the CIR mixtures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it