MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224109040 · doi:10.29173/psur294

Cancelling, Counter-speech and Censorship

2022· article· en· W4224109040 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ada Wright

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitical Science Undergraduate Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensorshipCivil libertiesSocial mediaFreedom of expressionExpression (computer science)Action (physics)Political sciencePublic relationsFirst amendmentInternet privacySociologyLawComputer sciencePoliticsHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the post-2016 period, the role of social media as a public utility and a platform for expression has drawn increased attention, debate, and - for some - ultimately concern. This has become especially true regarding its role in both facilitating and yet also restricting expression in online communities. While social media has been oft turned towards as a vehicle for social action, this paper raises simultaneous concerns still developing regarding its use for doing so. Ultimately, social media, while a viable tool for social change, also presents distinct and developing concerns for our civil liberties particullarly in an age dominated by online algorithms, private regulation of expression, and an increasingly virulent era of 'cancel culture'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitical Science Undergraduate ReviewSame topicHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionFrench-language works237,207