MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224117295 · doi:10.1101/2022.04.01.486772

miRNA upregulate protein and glycan expression via direct activation in proliferating cells

2022· preprint· en· W4224117295 on OpenAlexafffund
Faezeh Jame-Chenarboo, Hoi Hei Ng, Dawn Macdonald, Lara K. Mahal

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsDownregulation and upregulationmicroRNACell biologyGlycanMessenger RNABiologyRegulation of gene expressionComputational biologyChemistryMolecular biologyBiochemistryGeneGlycoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dominant paradigm is that miRNA binding to mRNA represses protein expression. Activation by miRNA has been observed in select circumstances (quiescent cells, mitochondria), but is not thought a feature of miRNA action in actively dividing cells. Herein, we comprehensively map the miRNA regulation of α-2,6-sialyltransferases ST6GAL1 and ST6GAL2 using a high-throughput assay (miRFluR). We find the majority of miRNA targeting ST6GAL1, the main enzyme controlling α-2,6-sialylation, upregulate protein expression. In contrast, those that regulate ST6GAL2 are predominantly downregulatory. We provide evidence that miRNA-mediated upregulation occurs in proliferating cells and is a direct effect. Further, we show that AGO2 and FXR1 are required. Our data expands current understanding of miRNA, providing strong evidence of both upregulatory and downregulatory roles for these non-coding RNA. One-Sentence Summary miRNA directly activate expression of α-2,6-sialyltransferases and sialylation, expanding miRNA actions in dividing cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207