MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224120640 · doi:10.21428/cb6ab371.0ba7dae1

Association of childhood bullying victimization with suicide deaths: Findings from a 50-year nationwide cohort study

2022· article· en· W4224120640 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Claude Geoffroy, Louise Arseneault, Alain Girard, Isabelle Ouellet‐Morin, Chris Power

Bibliographic record

VenueCrimRxiv · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
FundersGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthEconomic and Social Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CentreAmerican Foundation for Suicide Prevention
KeywordsCohortSuicide preventionAssociation (psychology)MedicinePoison controlOccupational safety and healthInjury preventionCohort studyHuman factors and ergonomicsDemographyPsychiatryPsychologyMedical emergencyInternal medicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Bullying victimization has been associated with increased risk of suicide ideation and attempt throughout the lifespan, but no study has yet examined whether it translates to greater risk of death by suicide. We aimed to determine the association of bullying victimization with suicide mortality. Methods: Participants were drawn from the 1958 British Birth Cohort, a prospective follow-up of all births in one week in Britain in 1958. We conducted logistic regressions on 14,946 participants whose mothers reported bullying victimization at 7 and 11 years with linked information on suicide deaths through the National Health Service Central Register.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrimRxivSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207