MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224134962 · doi:10.1002/rnc.6119

Stochastic fixed‐time formation for nonlinear multi‐agent systems under a discontinuous protocol

2022· article· en· W4224134962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSettling timeNonlinear systemProtocol (science)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceUpper and lower boundsSimple (philosophy)Tracking (education)Multi-agent systemStability (learning theory)Control (management)MathematicsMathematical optimizationControl engineeringEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article mainly studies the time‐varying fixed‐time formation (FTF) tracking control problem for stochastically disturbed nonlinear multi‐agent systems on detail balanced graphs. First, a novel sufficient condition for ensuring the fixed‐time stability in probability of stochastic differential equation is given. Then, using the neighboring information, a simple discontinuous control protocol is designed for achieving time‐varying FTF. By means of non‐smooth analysis techniques, our control objective is obtained and a proper upper bound for the expectation of the stochastic settling time is estimated. Finally, a numerical illustration demonstrates that the proposed control protocol is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it