MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224134962 · doi:10.1002/rnc.6119

Stochastic fixed‐time formation for nonlinear multi‐agent systems under a discontinuous protocol

2022· article· en· W4224134962 on OpenAlexaff
Wennuo He, Wanli Guo, Lili Shi, Wen Sun, Hadi Jahanshahi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSettling timeNonlinear systemProtocol (science)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceUpper and lower boundsSimple (philosophy)Tracking (education)Multi-agent systemStability (learning theory)Control (management)MathematicsMathematical optimizationControl engineeringEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article mainly studies the time‐varying fixed‐time formation (FTF) tracking control problem for stochastically disturbed nonlinear multi‐agent systems on detail balanced graphs. First, a novel sufficient condition for ensuring the fixed‐time stability in probability of stochastic differential equation is given. Then, using the neighboring information, a simple discontinuous control protocol is designed for achieving time‐varying FTF. By means of non‐smooth analysis techniques, our control objective is obtained and a proper upper bound for the expectation of the stochastic settling time is estimated. Finally, a numerical illustration demonstrates that the proposed control protocol is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207