MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224209482 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562037/v1

Evolutionary Causal Matrices as Models of Social Stability and/or Change

2022· preprint· en· W4224209482 on OpenAlexaff
Burton Voorhees

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsStability (learning theory)Mathematical economicsMatrix (chemical analysis)PopulationBinary numberMatrix normMathematicsNorm (philosophy)EconometricsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceEpistemologySociologyPhysicsChemistryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper considers evolutionary causal matrices (ECM), which have been proposed as a tool for determination of population distributions of traits in cases in which traits exert mutual influence on each other. In the case of 2x2 ECM a complete mathematical analysis is given including determination of equilibrium distributions and stability. A theorem is proved relating equilibrium stability to ratios of matrix eigenvalues. Several 2x2 ECMs are studied as potential examples of application to questions of norm compliance and binary decisions. 3x3 EMCs are considered as possible examples for modeling political debate between opposed parties with an intermediary group of independents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207