Novel Extended State Observer Design for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems via Refined Dynamic Event-Triggered Communication Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, an extended state observer (ESO) design problem is investigated for uncertain nonlinear systems subject to limited network bandwidth. First, for rational information exchange scheduling, a dynamic event-triggered (DET) communication protocol is proposed. Different from the traditional static event-triggered strategies with fixed thresholds, an internal dynamic variable is introduced to be adaptively adjusted by a dual-directional regulating mechanism. Thus, more desirable tradeoff between observation performance and communication resource efficiency is achieved. Second, inspired by our early work on Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy ESO (TSFESO), a novel paradigm of event-triggered TSFESO is initially proposed. Third, under the DET mechanism, the TSFESO design approach is derived to carry out exponential convergence for estimation error dynamics. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by numerical examples. The nonlinear estimating efficiency and linear numerical tractability are integrated in TSFESO. In addition, a generalized ESO formulation is developed to allow some nonadditive uncertainties incompatible with total disturbance, such as improved event-triggered strategy, and thus, the application sphere of ESO is further expanded.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".