MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224214371 · doi:10.1002/adaw.33410

Supervised consumption sites' variability outlined

2022· article· en· W4224214371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarm reductionInterimOpioid overdoseHarmConsumption (sociology)MedicineHealth careBusiness(+)-NaloxoneSociologyPublic healthNursingPolitical scienceLawOpioid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An article on supervised consumption sites found that there are no strict rules for how they operate, and that they are “as varied as the communities in which they operate.” The article, published in the April 6 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ), quoted Kimberly Sue, M.D., Ph.D., medical director of the National Harm Reduction Coalition, on the fact that “These are things that people who use drugs and people who care about them have been doing for years.” The sites can be as simple as a social service agency restroom stall, or as expansive as Vancouver's Insite, which has hundreds of injection room visits a day and offers detox rooms with private bathrooms, transitional housing and other wraparound services. Because the main cause of opioid overdose deaths is respiratory depression, naloxone is essential. So is sternal pressure to stimulate breathing, the article noted. Most supervised consumption sites aim to prevent HIV transmission, wound infection and help for people who inject drugs in general. “People wrongly assume that people using drugs don't care about their health,” Alex Kral, Ph.D., an epidemiologist with the nonprofit research institute RTI International in Berkeley, California, told JAMA . Jim McDonald, M.D., M.P.H., interim director of the Rhode Island Department of Health, said supervised consumption sites shouldn't operate underground, the way Kral's does. “Let's recognize they need a safe place to use,” McDonald, who oversees the state's overdose prevention efforts, said in an interview. Substance use disorder “is a complex biopsychosocial problem,” he noted, “but it doesn't get better by keeping secrets.” The federal Department of Justice knows what Rhode Island is doing, said McDonald. Rhode Island's first harm‐reduction centers, part of a two‐year pilot program, were hoped to open soon. One problem is NIMBY — the “not in my backyard” issue presented by communities that support supervised consumption sites — somewhere else. Kral's work is supported in part by Arnold Ventures, the article, “Supervised Consumption Sites — A Tool for Reducing Risk of Overdose Deaths and Infectious Diseases in People Who Use Illicit Drugs” by Rita Rubin and colleagues, disclosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcoholism & Drug Abuse WeeklySame topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskFrench-language works237,207