MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224215033 · doi:10.1063/5.0085137

From film to ring: Quasi-circular inorganic lead halide perovskite grain induced growth of uniform lead silicate glass ring structure

2022· article· en· W4224215033 on OpenAlexaff
Guoqing Tong, Wentao Song, Luis K. Ono, Yabing Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials sciencePerovskite (structure)SilicateSubstrate (aquarium)HalideCrystalliteChemical engineeringMineralogyCrystallographyInorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polycrystalline properties of perovskites can induce the growth of different nanostructures, thanks to their facile fabrication. In this work, the CsPb2Br5 perovskite grains were used as templates to induce the growth of the ring-like structures on a SiO2/Si substrate. Owing to the oxidation of the volatile PbBr2 originated from the decomposition of CsPb2Br5, the grain boundaries of perovskites are prone to reaction with SiO2, which leads to the formation of Pb-silicate glass at high temperatures. The quasi-circular grain structure of CsPb2Br5 defines the final dimension of the Pb-silicate glass ring-like structures. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement results reveal the formation and composition of the Pb-silicate glass ring-like structures converting from the halide perovskite film on the SiO2/Si substrate. Furthermore, these ring-like structures can extend to the field of display and pulsed-laser by combining existing techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207