MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224219384 · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ac6921

Biomimetic bi-material designs for additive manufacturing

2022· article· en· W4224219384 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Rahimizadeh, Hamidreza Yazdani Sarvestani, Julieta Barroeta Robles, Javad Gholipour, Behnam Ashrafi

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinspiration & Biomimetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceStiffnessToughnessBrittlenessBendingMaterial DesignComposite materialFlexural strengthStructural engineeringMaterial propertiesBending stiffnessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superior material properties have been recently exhibited under the concept of biomimetic designs, where the material architectures are inspired by nature. In this study, a computational framework is developed to present novel architectured bi-material structures with tunable stiffness, strength, and toughness to be used for additive manufacturing (AM). The structure of natural nacre is mimicked to design robust multilayered structures constructed from hexagonal brittle and hard building blocks bonded with soft materials and supports. A set of computational models consisting of fully bonded zones, while allowing for interlayer interactions are created to accurately mimic the interplay between the hard and soft organic phases. As required for such complex designs, the numerical constraints are properly set to run quasi-static non-linear explicit analysis, which allow for a 3× faster analysis with higher efficiency and 2× lower computational cost, when compared to static analysis. The models are used to assess the stiffness, strength and toughness of bi-material beams when subjected to a flexural three-point bending load. The influence of structural features like the soft-to-hard volume ratio (i.e. the distance between each building block, its aspect ratio, and overlap length), material features (e.g. the stiffness ratio of the hard-to-soft phases), the plastic strain failure of soft phase, and AM features (e.g. different types of within-layer/sandwiched supports) are systematically investigated. The results revealed that the toughness of the architectured beams was enhanced by up to 25% when compared to a monolithic structure. This improvement is due to the frictional tile sliding in the brittle phase and the extensive shear plastic deformation of the soft interfaces. This work provides compatible designs to facilitate the AM of nacre-based bi-martial structures with balanced/tailored mechanical performance and to understand the influence of the architectural parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinspiration & BiomimeticsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207