MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224222447 · doi:10.2967/jnmt.121.262900

Validation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast Determination of Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Burden in Pediatric Lymphoma

2022· article· en· W4224222447 on OpenAlex
Elba Etchebehere, Rebeca Andrade, Mariana Camacho, Mariana Lima, Anita Brink, Juliano J. Cerci, Helen Nadel, Chandrasekhar Bal, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Thomas Pfluger, Olga Kagna, Ómar Alonso, Fatima Begum, Kahkashan Bashir Mir, Vincent Peter C. Magboo, Leon Menezes, Diana Páez, Thomas N.B. Pascual

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversidade Estadual de Campinas
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkMedicineIntraclass correlationConcordanceLymphomaNuclear medicineConcordance correlation coefficientSoftwareRadiologyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceInternal medicineStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT quantification of whole-body tumor burden in lymphoma is not routinely performed because of the lack of fast methods. Although the semiautomatic method is fast, it is not fast enough to quantify tumor burden in daily clinical practice. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of convolutional neural network (CNN) software in localizing neoplastic lesions in whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images of pediatric lymphoma patients. <b>Methods:</b> The retrospective image dataset, derived from the data pool of the International Atomic Energy Agency (coordinated research project E12017), included 102 baseline staging <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT studies of pediatric lymphoma patients (mean age, 11 y). The images were quantified to determine the whole-body tumor burden (whole-body metabolic tumor volume [wbMTV] and whole-body total lesion glycolysis [wbTLG]) using semiautomatic software and CNN-based software. Both were displayed as semiautomatic wbMTV and wbTLG and as CNN wbMTV and wbTLG. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was applied to evaluate concordance between the CNN-based software and the semiautomatic software. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-six patients were excluded from the analysis because the software was unable to perform calculations for them. In the remaining 76 patients, CNN and semiautomatic wbMTV tumor burden metrics correlated strongly (ICC, 0.993; 95% CI, 0.989 − 0.996; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), as did CNN and semiautomatic wbTLG (ICC, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.998–0.999; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). However, the time spent calculating these metrics was significantly (&lt;0.0001) less by CNN (mean, 19 s; range, 11–50 s) than by the semiautomatic method (mean, 21.6 min; range, 3.2–62.1 min), especially in patients with advanced disease. <b>Conclusion:</b> Determining whole-body tumor burden in pediatric lymphoma patients using CNN is fast and feasible in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it