A Review of Stand-Alone and Hybrid Microbial Electrochemical Systems for Antibiotics Removal from Wastewater
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing concern about residual antibiotics in the water environment pushes for innovative and cost-effective technologies for antibiotics removal from wastewater. In this context, various microbial electrochemical systems have been investigated as an alternative to conventional wastewater technologies that are usually ineffective for the adequate removal of antibiotics. This review article details the development of stand-alone and hybrid or integrated microbial electrochemical systems for antibiotics removal from wastewater. First, technical features, antibiotics removal efficiencies, process optimization, and technological bottlenecks of these systems are discussed. Second, a comparative summary based on the existing reports was established to provide insights into the selection between stand-alone and hybrid systems. Finally, research gaps, the relevance of recent progress in complementary areas, and future research needs have been discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it