MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224228189 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2021-0213

A critical saturated state-based constitutive model for volumetric behavior of compacted bentonite

2022· preprint· en· W4224228189 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yang Wang, Weimin Ye, Qiong Wang, Yong-Gui Chen, Yu‐Jun Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringShrinkageSuctionExpansive clayIsotropyConstitutive equationBentoniteSwellingMaterials scienceNonlinear systemSaturation (graph theory)Critical state soil mechanicsStress (linguistics)CompactionMechanicsGeologySoil waterComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsStructural engineeringSoil scienceMechanical engineeringFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, more and more unique volumetric behaviors, including the nonlinear compression and unloading curves in the e-lnp plane, and different types of swelling and shrinkage curves obtained from suction-controlled swelling and shrinkage tests, etc., which are significantly different from those of nonexpansive clays, have been reported on compacted bentonite. More importantly, limitations were encountered when describing the unique behavior with existing constitutive models for unsaturated expansive soils. In this study, a new concept of critical saturation state (CSS) was proposed for compacted bentonite, in which, as the saturated state was reached, the matric suction still remained nonzero in the soil. Incorporated with this concept, a constitutive model was proposed. In this model, the CSS curve was defined in the suction-isotropic stress plane, delimiting the unsaturated zone. To validate the model, the volume change tests conducted on compacted GMZ bentonite under different stress paths were simulated. Good agreement confirmed that the proposed model could well describe the volume change behavior, including the swelling on hydration, shrinkage during drying, nonlinear compression, and unloading behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207