A Flexible Wearable Electrooculogram System With Motion Artifacts Sensing and Reduction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrooculogram (EOG) is a well-known physiological metric picked up by placing two or more electrodes around the eyeball. EOG signals are known to be extremely susceptible to motion artifacts. This paper presents a single channel, wireless, wearable flexible EOG monitoring system with motion artifacts sensing and reduction feature. The system uses two non-contact electrode pairs for EOG/motion artifacts detection and motion artifacts reduction. It is implemented on a four-layer flexible polyimide substrate. It is light-weight (only 8.75 gram), battery operated, and uses a microcontroller and a BLE 5.0 transceiver for wireless EOG data transmission, while consuming only 56 mW of power. The system metrics such as gain around 37 dB, bandwidth from 1 Hz to 40 Hz, and noise are evaluated. The system is tested for different electrode configurations and it is demonstrated that horizontally parallel electrode pairs achieve an acceptable motion artifact reduction at the output, while preserving perfect EOG features (such as eye-blinking). The average sensitivity for horizontally parallel non-contact electrodes is found out to be more than 50 times with respect to commercial gold electrodes, whereas the average response time of the sensor is around 380 mS. The flexible EOG system is comfortable to wear and the use of non-contact electrode eliminates the need of skin preparation. Therefore, the system can be easily integrated with eye-masks and headbands, thus making it an excellent prototype for many smart applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it