The Crystal Structure of Malhmoodite from Custer, South Dakota, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT An occurrence of malhmoodite, Fe2+Zr(PO4)2·4H2O, from the Scott's Rose Quartz mine, Custer County, South Dakota, USA, has been identified. It occurs as divergent groups of yellowish, flat-lying platy crystals on football-size masses of altered löllingite with scorodite, parasymplesite, karibibite, schneiderhöhnite, kahlerite, and zircon. An electron probe microanalysis of malhmoodite yielded an empirical formula (based on 12 O apfu) of Fe1.06(Zr1.10Hf0.03)Σ1.13[(P0.93As0.01)Σ0.94O4]2·4H2O. Single-crystal X-ray structure analysis shows that malhmoodite is the Fe-analogue of zigrasite, MgZr(PO4)2·4H2O. Malhmoodite is triclinic with space group P and unit-cell parameters a = 5.31200(10), b = 9.3419(3), c = 9.7062(3) Å, α = 97.6111(13), β = 91.9796(11), γ = 90.3628(12)°, V = 477.10(2) Å3, Z = 2, in contrast to the previously reported monoclinic symmetry with space group P21/c and unit-cell parameters a = 9.12(2), b = 5.42(1), c = 19.17(2) Å, β = 94.8(1)°, V = 944.26 Å3, Z = 4. The crystal structure of malhmoodite is characterized by sheets composed of ZrO6 octahedra sharing all vertices with PO4 tetrahedra. These sheets are parallel to (001) and are joined together by the FeO2(H2O)4 octahedra. The structure determination of malhmoodite, along with that of zigrasite, warrants a re-investigation of synthetic compounds M2+Zr(PO4)2·4H2O (M = Mn, Ni, Co, Cu, or Zn) that have been assumed previously to be monoclinic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".