MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224236499 · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000000875

Contrast Media Reduction in Computed Tomography With Deep Learning Using a Generative Adversarial Network in an Experimental Animal Study

2022· article· en· W4224236499 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Radiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContrast (vision)Deep learningGenerative adversarial networkComputed tomographyGenerative grammarAdversarial systemReduction (mathematics)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This feasibility study aimed to use optimized virtual contrast enhancement through generative adversarial networks (GAN) to reduce the dose of iodine-based contrast medium (CM) during abdominal computed tomography (CT) in a large animal model. METHODS: Multiphasic abdominal low-kilovolt CTs (90 kV) with low (low CM, 105 mgl/kg) and normal contrast media doses (normal CM, 350 mgl/kg) were performed with 20 healthy Göttingen minipigs on 3 separate occasions for a total of 120 examinations. These included an early arterial, late arterial, portal venous, and venous contrast phase. One animal had to be excluded because of incomplete examinations. Three of the 19 animals were randomly selected and withheld for validation (18 studies). Subsequently, the GAN was trained for image-to-image conversion from low CM to normal CM (virtual CM) with the remaining 16 animals (96 examinations). For validation, region of interest measurements were performed in the abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, liver parenchyma, and autochthonous back muscles, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. In addition, the normal CM and virtual CM data were presented in a visual Turing test to 3 radiology consultants. On the one hand, they had to decide which images were derived from the normal CM examination. On the other hand, they had to evaluate whether both images are pathological consistent. RESULTS: Average vascular CNR (low CM 6.9 ± 7.0 vs virtual CM 28.7 ± 23.8, P < 0.0001) and parenchymal (low CM 1.5 ± 0.7 vs virtual CM 3.8 ± 2.0, P < 0.0001) CNR increased significantly by GAN-based contrast enhancement in all contrast phases and was not significantly different from normal CM examinations (vascular: virtual CM 28.7 ± 23.8 vs normal CM 34.2 ± 28.8; parenchymal: virtual CM 3.8 ± 2.0 vs normal CM 3.7 ± 2.6). During the visual Turing testing, the radiology consultants reported that images from normal CM and virtual CM were pathologically consistent in median in 96.5% of the examinations. Furthermore, it was possible for the examiners to identify the normal CM data as such in median in 91% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this feasibility study, it could be demonstrated in an experimental setting with healthy Göttingen minipigs that the amount of CM for abdominal CT can be reduced by approximately 70% by GAN-based contrast enhancement with satisfactory image quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it