Formation of Core-Sheath Polymer Fibers by Free Surface Spinning of Aqueous Two-Phase Systems.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Core-sheath fibers have numerous applications ranging from composite materials for advanced manufacturing to materials for drug delivery and regenerative medicine. Here, a simple and tunable approach for the generation of core-sheath fibers from immiscible solutions of dextran and polyethylene oxide is described. This approach exploits the entanglement of polymer molecules within the dextran and polyethylene oxide phases for free surface spinning into dry fibers. The mechanism by which these core-sheath fibers are produced after contact with a solid substrate (such as a microneedle) involves complex flows of the phase-separating polymer solutions, giving rise to a liquid-liquid core-sheath flow that is drawn into a liquid bridge. This liquid bridge then elongates into a core-sheath fiber through extensional flow as the contacting substrate is withdrawn. The core-sheath structure of the fibers produced by this approach is confirmed by attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and confocal microscopy. Tuning of the core diameter is also demonstrated by varying the weight percentage of dextran added to the reservoir from which the fibers are formed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".