MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224244781 · doi:10.1259/bjrcr.20210239

Minimally invasive delivery of ethanol for the treatment of urinary bladder fistulas

2022· article· en· W4224244781 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Nanapragasam, Syed Umair Mahmood, Sebastian Mafeld, Philip Haslam

Bibliographic record

VenueBJR|case reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUreteral procedures and complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFistulaSurgeryUrinary systemUrinary FistulaCatheterFoley catheterFoleyBalloon catheterUrinary bladderInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urinary bladder fistula formation is a complication of significant morbidity and mortality following pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. Surgical treatment is the definitive management, but it may be contraindicated in patients with significant comorbidities. The alternative approach is to divert urine away from the fistula with stents and catheters, and allow time for healing. The case illustrated herein describes the use of alcohol to accelerate the fibrotic healing of a urinary bladder fistula, based on the premise that sclerosing agents have been effective in the treatment of pancreatic fistulas and renal cysts. A Foley catheter is inserted through the external fistula orifice and passed along the fistula tract into the urinary bladder. The Foley catheter balloon is inflated and pulled back to occlude the fistula. Following this, a vascular sheath is placed alongside the catheter and ethanol is injected into the tract. The alcohol is left to dwell in the fistula for a few minutes, after which time the catheter and sheath are removed. The sclerosant effect of the ethanol aims to induce fibrosis, and therefore occlusion, of the fistula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJR|case reportsSame topicUreteral procedures and complicationsFrench-language works237,207