MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224246872 · doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-d-21-00025

Simplified Free Gingival Graft Around Implants Using Medical Grade Tissue Cyanoacrylate: A Case Series Report

2022· article· en· W4224246872 on OpenAlexaff
Dong‐Seok Sohn, Mark Kwon, Hyung-Gyun Kim, Hyunsuk Choi, In‐Sook Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Oral Implantology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOral and gingival health research
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyanoacrylateDentistryFibrous jointMedicineAdhesiveCyanoacrylatesOrthodonticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The free gingival graft (FGG) procedure using suturing techniques has been widely utilized to effectively increase the amount of attached keratinized gingiva. However, conventional suturing procedures are time-consuming and technique-sensitive. Simplified FGG procedure around teeth and dental implants using medical grade tissue adhesive (cyanoacrylate) is known to overcome drawbacks of traditional suture techniques. However, the clinical application of cyanoacrylate as a means of stabilizing the graft has not been a common practice. The aim of this report demonstrates simplified FGG procedures around dental implants using cyanoacrylate with follow-up results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Oral ImplantologySame topicOral and gingival health researchFrench-language works237,207