MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hog: handling HDL repository on git

2022· article· en· W4224247660 on OpenAlexaff
N.V. Biesuz, D. Cieri, N. Giangiacomi, F. Gonnella, A. Peck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommitComputer scienceTraceabilitySoftware versioningOperating systemProgramming languageSoftware engineeringOpen sourceSource codeCode (set theory)DatabaseSoftwareSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Handling HDL project development within large collaborations presents many challenges in terms of maintenance and versioning, due to the lack of standardised procedures. Hog (HDL on git) is a tcl-based open-source management tool, created to simplify HDL project development and management by exploiting git and Gitlab Continuous Integration (CI). Hog is compatible with the major HDL IDEs from Xilinx and Intel-FPGA, and guarantees synthesis and placing reproducibility and binary file traceability, by linking each binary file to a specific git commit. Hog-CI validates any changes to the code, handles automatic versioning and can automatically simulate, synthesise and build the design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of InstrumentationSame topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207