Spatiotemporal DeepWalk Gated Recurrent Neural Network: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Learning and Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a typical spatiotemporal problem, there are three main challenges in traffic forecasting. First, the road network is a nonregular topology, and it is difficult to extract complex spatial dependence accurately. Second, there are short- and long-term dependencies between traffic dates. Third, there are many other factors besides the influence of spatiotemporal dependence, such as semantic characteristics. To address these issues, we propose a spatiotemporal DeepWalk gated recurrent unit model (ST-DWGRU), a deep learning framework that fuses spatial, temporal, and semantic features for traffic speed forecasting. In the framework, the spatial dependency between nodes of an entire road network is extracted by graph convolutional network (GCN), whereas the temporal dependency between speeds is captured by a gated recurrent unit network (GRU). DeepWalk is used to extract semantic information from road networks. Three publicly available datasets with different time granularities of 15, 30, and 60 min are used to validate the short- and long-time prediction effect of this model. The results show that the ST-DWGRU model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".