Advances in Deformable Plate Tectonic Models: 2. Reconstructing the Southern North Atlantic Back Through Time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The offshore rifted margins of the North Atlantic have a spatially complex crustal structure comprised of variable crustal morphologies, continental blocks, and inherited structures. Recently, deformable plate tectonic models have permitted the interplay of plate kinematics and deformation to be assessed throughout the North Atlantic, and elsewhere. In particular, the ability to calculate temporal variations in crustal thickness has provided insight into the kinematic role of continental blocks and their interplay with large and micro‐tectonic plates during the formation of the North Atlantic offshore rifted margins. In this study, the deformable plate modeling workflow introduced in the companion contribution of this study (Part 1) is used to investigate previously published and newly presented deformable plate models of the Newfoundland, Irish, and West Iberian margins. This approach permits the deformation and subsequent crustal thickness evolution within previously recognized continental blocks and sedimentary basins throughout the southern North Atlantic Ocean to be visualized and assessed from 200 Ma to present day. The segmentation of early rift crustal thicknesses calculated by deformable plate models demonstrate strong correlations with the offshore extension of Appalachian and Caledonian terrane boundaries. Thus, our observations suggest that inherited orogenic boundaries potentially play a key role in the early rift crustal structure of sedimentary basins and the partitioning of deformation around and within continental blocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".