Based on Citespace V: The Development and Enlightenment of Research on Foreign Obese Adolescent’s Sports
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By using Citespace V, this paper made a metrological analysis and visualization analysis of 2265 papers about foreign obese adolescent’s sports from 1991 to 2021, which were downloaded from SCIE, SSCI and A&HCI of web of science. Conclusions: (1) The publication of papers in the United States ranks first?followed by Australia, Spain, Canada and England respectively. Countries such as Sweden, Finland, Denmark and South Africa have rare papers, but achieve great influence relatively. (2) The researched papers are distributed in 523 journals. Among them, BMC Public Health ranks first in the number of articles published, followed by Journal of School Health. Journal of Physical Activity & Health ranks third. (3) Keywords such as adolescent, physical activity, obesity and health have led the research trend in the field of foreign obese adolescents’ sports in the past 30 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.101 | 0.082 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".