MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224267962 · doi:10.1111/jsr.13594

Scoring heart rate increases as a surrogate arousal marker on portable monitor studies for obstructive sleep apnea: Impact on diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision‐making

2022· article· en· W4224267962 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Lachapelle, Sulaiman Khadadah, Ryeyan Taseen, Sushmita Pamidi, R. John Kimoff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sleep Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysomnographyMedicineHypopneaObstructive sleep apneaHeart rate variabilityApneaApnea–hypopnea indexCardiologyPhysical therapyHeart rateInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cortical arousal-related hypopneas are not scored on type 3 home devices, which therefore limits their diagnostic accuracy for obstructive sleep apnea. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether scoring heart rate accelerations as surrogate markers of arousal improves type 3 portable monitor diagnostic agreement compared with polysomnography and improves therapeutic decision-making. We prospectively recruited patients evaluated for obstructive sleep apnea to undergo in-laboratory simultaneous full polysomnography + type 3 portable monitoring. Hypopnea events were scored on portable monitor studies with and without autonomic scoring, which was defined as an associated increase in pulse oximetry-derived heart rate ≥6 beats per min (autonomic hypopnea). Portable monitor diagnostic agreement compared with polysomnography with and without autonomic hypopnea scoring was assessed. We also evaluated whether reporting autonomic hypopnea scoring improves portable monitor clinical treatment decision agreement after four physicians reviewed clinical data and sleep study results (polysomnography, portable monitor with autonomic hypopnea, portable monitor without autonomic hypopnea). Eighty-two participants completed simultaneous polysomnography and in-laboratory portable monitor studies. Scoring autonomic hypopnea resulted in a decreased mean difference between in-laboratory portable monitor respiratory event index and polysomnography apnea-hypopnea index in Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference 14.6 per hr without versus 6.1 per hr with autonomic hypopnea scoring [p ˂ 0.01]), and increased intraclass correlation from 0.769 to 0.844. Inclusion of autonomic hypopnea scoring resulted in better accuracy between portable monitor and polysomnography expert's treatment decisions, and ultimately resulted in 24% fewer additional polysomnographies requested. The addition of pulse oximetry heart rate increases for autonomic hypopnea scoring during portable monitor resulted in better diagnostic agreement, improved clinical decision-making and reduced additional polysomnography testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.082
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.082
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sleep ResearchSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207