MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224272151 · doi:10.1109/vrw55335.2022.00201

Splitting Large Convolutional Neural Network Layers to Run Real-Time Applications on Mixed-Reality Hardware: Extended Abstract

2022· article· en· W4224272151 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony Paul Beug, Howard J. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkFrame rateConvolution (computer science)Frame (networking)Overhead (engineering)GraphConvolutional codeParallel computingAlgorithmReal-time computingComputer engineeringArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceDecoding methodsOperating systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When executing computationally expensive Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in real-time mixed-reality applications, some convolutional layers may take longer than the target frame time to execute. Here, dropped frames produced by large convolutional layers are avoided by dividing the work performed in a convolution so that it can be executed over multiple frames. A novel method is described to schedule the execution of the layers of a CNN by modifying the model graph of a pretrained CNN by splitting large convolutions. Overhead is introduced, but the average frame rate is increased since delays produced by computing large layers are avoided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207