Quantitative Inversion Modeling Method for Grading Deerni Copper Deposits Based on Visible and Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantitative metal grade inversion based on hyperspectral data is an effective approach to achieve the real-time in situ determination of ore body grades and has the advantages of low cost compared with traditional chemical analysis methods. However, the redundant nature of hyperspectral data and the parameter-limiting nature of machine learning algorithms reduce the modeling accuracy and precision, resulting in severe limitations on the application of hyperspectral techniques for the grade inversion of Deerni copper ore bodies. In this paper, we first obtained visible-NIR hyperspectral data for 190 ore samples using a spectrometer and determined the copper content of the sample set using chemical analysis; then, we processed the raw hyperspectral data using three dimensionality reduction algorithms and optimized a BP neural network based on an evolutionary algorithm. Finally, a Deerni copper grade inversion model was established using the hyperspectral data before and after dimensionality reduction, and the inversion accuracy and precision was compared and analyzed with that obtained by the BP neural network, the random forest and the variable hidden layer nodes models. The combination of the LLE dimensionality reduction algorithm and the optimized BP neural network algorithm achieves the highest modeling precision, with an R2 of 0.950.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".