Seasonal Variations in Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Capacity and Its Dependence on Climate Factors Across Global FLUXNET Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) is an important parameter affecting the photosynthesis rate of plant leaves. In terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs), Vcmax at 25°C (Vm25°) is often assigned as constants according to plant functional types (PFTs), while its variations with leaf temperature and nutrient contents are described using empirical functions. However, Vm25° could itself vary seasonally due to changes in the leaf physiological state that cannot be described by the empirical functions, potentially causing large uncertainties in simulated water and carbon fluxes. So far, the seasonal variation in Vm25° has not been systematically studied. Here, we generated a Vm25° data set of eight main biomes from 2000 to 2020 using eddy covariance (EC) measurements at globally distributed 176 sites. The boreal ecosystem productivity simulator was combined with a light response curve model (BEPS‐LRC) to invert Vm25° from EC data. We investigated seasonal variations of Vm25° and analyzed how different environmental and physiological factors, such as physiological (leaf chlorophyll content, LCC and Rubisco or RuBP) and climatic environment factors, including air temperature (Ta), solar shortwave radiation, CO 2 concentration (CO 2 ), and soil water content (SWC), influence this parameter. Vm25° values derived from flux data using BEPS‐LRC correlate well with Vm25° of the reference data set ( R 2 = 0.74, slope = 0.77, and root mean square error = 24.45 μmol m −2 s −1 , p < 0.001). Leaf Vm25° has strong seasonal variations in all PFTs except for in evergreen broadleaf forests, but its seasonal variation patterns differ greatly among eight biomes. Air temperature (Ta) is the most important determinant of Vm25°, followed by SWC. The interactive effects of Ta and SWC on Vm25° vary among different biomes. The seasonal variation of Vm25° was strongly dependent on LCC. After the correction of temperature effect, the contribution of LCC to the seasonal variation of Vm25° averaged 26% among eight biomes. These findings provide useful information for better parameterization of Vm25° in TEMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".