MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predictive COVID-19 Risk and Virus Mutation isolation with CNN based Machine learning Technique

2022· article· en· W4224280245 on OpenAlexaff
Pavan Patel, Mohit Bhadla, Jinal Upadhyay, Dhruvi Suthar, Drashti Darji

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsAlpha Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceAdversarial systemIsolation (microbiology)Artificial neural networkMachine learningResidualData miningAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the research of applying deep learning to CT intelligent recognition of new coronary pneumonia, many researchers have built deep neural network training models on understanding the content of medical image data and assisting in the diagnosis of new coronary pneumonia. The AMDRC-Net architecture is proposed, in which the residual structure solves the problem of network degradation through identity mapping. At the same time, for the new situation that the residual system hinders the exploration of new features, inspired by the latest research such as attention mechanism, the research length Attention Guidance Mechanism. First, focus on the security of the deep learning model discuss the adversarial attack method based on gradient ascent; to solve the problem of its singularity, the long and short attention mechanism is used to increase the effective adversarial disturbance while reducing the redundant disruption. Next, the proposed adversarial attack algorithm AAS transforms the adversarial attack problem into an adaptive constraint problem; that is, the micro-transformation idea is used in the iterative attack, and the relationship between the attention guidance mechanism the DNN adversarial attack is explored. In the last experiment, on the CT data set of new coronary pneumonia, AMDRC-Net is used for model training, and comparison experiments, visualization experiments, and adversarial attack experiments are designed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)Same topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207