MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224280425 · doi:10.1142/s021919972250016x

Helmholtz solutions for the fractional Laplacian and other related operators

2022· article· en· W4224280425 on OpenAlex
Vincent Guan, Mathav Murugan, Juncheng Wei

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBounded functionHelmholtz equationHelmholtz free energyFractional LaplacianLaplace operatorMathematicsd'Alembert's formulaPure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that the bounded solutions to the fractional Helmholtz equation, [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text], are given by the bounded solutions to the classical Helmholtz equation [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] when [Formula: see text] is additionally assumed to be vanishing at [Formula: see text]. When [Formula: see text], we show that the bounded fractional Helmholtz solutions are again given by the classical solutions [Formula: see text]. We show that this classification of fractional Helmholtz solutions extends for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] when [Formula: see text]. Finally, we prove that the classical solutions are the unique bounded solutions to the more general equation [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text], when [Formula: see text] is complete Bernstein and certain regularity conditions are imposed on the associated weight [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.306
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.097 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it