MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Possibilities nootropic drugs in non-demented patients with vascular cognitive disorders

2022· article· en· W4224281699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М. Н. Дадашева, Р. В. Горенков, V. A. Kruglov, K. N. Dadasheva, D. I. Lebedeva

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiracetamTolerabilityCinnarizineNootropicMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineAnxietyDementiaRating scaleHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleInternal medicineVascular dementiaAnesthesiaPsychologyPsychiatryAdverse effectDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: to study the clinical efficacy and tolerability of omberacetam in comparison with piracetam/cinnarizine and aminophenylbutyric acid in non-demented patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Patients and methods. The study included 150 patients with VCI that does not meet dementia, randomized into three groups of 50 patients. In addition to the basis therapy, patients of the 1st group recieved omberacetam 10 mg 2 times per day, the 2nd group – piracetam/cinnarizine 400/25 mg (1 tablet) 3 times per day, the 3rd group – aminophenylbutyric acid 250 mg 3 times per day. The duration of the treatment course was 45 days. In 50 patients of the 1st group and another 50 patients with VCI from other groups, the duration of the nootropic effect of omberacetam was evaluated 3.5 months after the end of follow-up. Cognitive functions and emotional state of patients were assessed using: 1) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); 2) Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A); 3) Subjective assessment of asthenia scale; 4) Modified subjective sleep characteristics scale. Evaluation of treatment effectiveness and tolerability was carried out. Results and discussion. During omberacetam treatment a significant improvement in well-being and regression of patient complaints were observed. After 45 days of therapy an increase in the mean MoCA score from 19.8 to 23.3 points (p≥0.001) was observed in the omberacetam group. In other groups, an increase in the mean MoCA score was also noted, but it was less significant. A decrease in asthenic symptoms, anxiety, and dissomnic disorders was present in all studied groups. Anxiety level, assessed by the HAM-A, decreased by 16.9; 19.9 and 20.0 points (p≥0.001) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Sleep characteristics, assessed by the subjective sleep characteristics scale, improved by 4.6; 5.0 and 5.3 points (p≥0.001), respectively. 4.5 months after the completion of the omberacetam treatment course, the mean MoCA score was 0.8 points higher compared to baseline (p=0.061). Conclusion. The results showed high efficacy and safety of omberacetam in patients with VCI. A long-term positive effect of omberacetam was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology neuropsychiatry PsychosomaticsSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207