Design of a Transparent System for Mutual Coupling Reduction of Microstrip Array Antennas with Confined Water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herein, a new method for minimizing mutual coupling of an antenna array with confined water is proposed. In multiantenna systems, mutual coupling reduction is needed to sustain array signal processing efficiency. There are currently a variety of ways to suppress coupling, including defected ground, electromagnetic (EM) bandgaps, and advanced structures. The water absorption characteristic is devised in this innovative approach to minimize mutual coupling without a permanent alteration in the structure. Surface current between two antennas is cancelled using permittivity and water depth in a new configuration. A plexi‐glass confined water is added between the propagating elements to achieve this aim. The rectangular microstrip patch of transparent conducting components serves as the antenna array. Using scattering theories, numerical EM calculations, and anechoic chamber tests, the suggested technique shows a 15 dB decrease in coupling at center frequency (7 GHz). Other propagating functions have also been improved. The suggested framework can be used in multifunction communication networks, aerial vehicle antennas, solar panels, and naval communications because of its optical transparency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".