MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224286669 · doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101068

Peace, not war in Ukraine or anywhere else, please

2022· editorial· en· W4224286669 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Yves Lefrant, Romain Pirracchio, Dan Benhamou, Marc-Olivier Fischer, Rosanna Njeim, Bernard Allaouchiche, Sophie Bastide, Matthieu Biais, Lionel Bouvet, Olivier Brissaud, Sorin J. Brull, Xavier Capdevila, Nicola Groes Clausen, Philippe Cuvillon, Christophe Dadure, Jean David, Bin Du, Sharon Einav, Victoria Eley, Patrice Forget, Tomoko Fujii, Anne Godiér, Dean Gopalan, Sophie Hamada, Ahmed Hasanin, Olivier Joannès-Boyau, Sébastien Kerever, Éric Kipnis, Kerstin Kolodzie, Ruth Landau, Arthur Le Gall, Morgan Le Guen, Matthieu Legrand, Emmanuel Lorne, F.J. Mercier, Nicolas Mongardon, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Armelle Nicolas-Robin, Mark Peters, Hervé Quintard, Jordi Rello, Philippe Richebé, Jason Roberts, Antoine Rocquilly, Filippo Sanfilippo, Antoine Schneider, Mircea T. Sofonea, Francis Veyckemans, Paul J. Zetlaoui, Ahed Zeidan, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Marzena Zielińska, Britta S. von Ungern‐Sternberg, Osama Abou‐Arab, Alice Blet, Fanny Vardon‐Bounes, Matthieu Boisson, Anaïs Caillard, Aude Carillion, Thomas Clavier, Denis Frasca, Arthur James, Stéphanie Sigaut, Sacha Rozencwajg, Pierre Albaladejo, H. Bouaziz

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0160.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain MedicineSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207