MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SimPlot++: a Python application for representing sequence similarity and detecting recombination

2022· article· en· W4224287786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceSequence (biology)Computational biologyProgramming languageBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Accurate detection of sequence similarity and homologous recombination are essential parts of many evolutionary analyses. RESULTS: We have developed SimPlot++, an open-source multiplatform application implemented in Python, which can be used to produce publication quality sequence similarity plots using 63 nucleotide and 20 amino acid distance models, to detect intergenic and intragenic recombination events using Φ, Max-χ2, NSS or proportion tests, and to generate and analyze interactive sequence similarity networks. SimPlot++ supports multicore data processing and provides useful distance calculability diagnostics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SimPlot++ is freely available on GitHub at: https://github.com/Stephane-S/Simplot_PlusPlus, as both an executable file (for Windows) and Python scripts (for Windows/Linux/MacOS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it