MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224292523 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c09150

The Magnetic Genome of Two-Dimensional van der Waals Materials

2022· review· nl· W4224292523 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Hua Wang, Amilcar Bedoya‐Pinto, Mark Blei, Avalon H. Dismukes, Assaf Hamo, Sarah M. Jenkins, Maciej Koperski, Yu Liu, Qi-Chao Sun, Evan J. Telford, Hyun Ho Kim, Mathias Augustin, Uri Vool, Jia‐Xin Yin, Lu Hua Li, Alexey Falin, Cory R. Dean, Fèlix Casanova, Richard F. L. Evans, Mairbek Chshiev, Artem Mishchenko, C. Petrović, Rui He, Liuyan Zhao, Adam W. Tsen, Brian D. Gerardot, Mauro Brotons‐Gisbert, Zurab Guguchia, Xavier Roy, Sefaattin Tongay, Ziwei Wang, M. Zahid Hasan, Jörg Wrachtrup, Amir Yacoby, A. Fert, S. Parkin, Kostya S. Novoselov, Pengcheng Dai, Luis Balicas, Elton J. G. Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2022
Typereview
Languagenl
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchArmy Research OfficeBasic Energy SciencesDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber SystemsEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of EdinburghOffice of Multidisciplinary ActivitiesAgence Nationale de la RechercheMinistry of Education - SingaporeGordon and Betty Moore FoundationMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesH2020 Future and Emerging TechnologiesDivision of Materials ResearchNational Research Foundation of KoreaRoyal Academy of EngineeringSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungRoyal SocietyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftWelch Foundation
KeywordsMagnetismSpintronicsvan der Waals forceMagnonicsNanotechnologyPhysicsSpinsCondensed matter physicsFerromagnetismMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsSpin polarization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, synthesis, device engineering, magneto-optics, imaging, transport, mechanics, spin excitations, and theory and simulations) have joined together to provide a genome of current knowledge and a guideline for future developments in 2D magnetic materials research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations480
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207