Interactions Between Water Level, Crude Oil, and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Ghana; A Structured Vector Auto Regression Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Countries that suffer disturbances in their power generation are less likely to meet many of the sustainable development goals and general economic growth. This study used a three-variable SVAR model to examine the interactions of water level, crude oil and power generated from the Akosombo hydroelectric generation Dam in Ghana. Data used for this span from January 2010 to December 2019. From the results, none of the three important variables studied was found to be completely independent; dam level and crude oil are adjusted to absorb power generation shocks. All three variables drift away from their normal levels to contain shock before returning to their desired levels at varying time points. It has also been established that Dam water level shocks leads to a negative response in both power generation and crude oil in the short run. Overall, shocks to crude oil explains much of the variability in power generation than shocks to dam water level. These findings convey that there is exist very useful interactions among the three-variables studied in this paper. Policy makers should institute effective measures for early detection and intervention of the short-term power disturbance that characterizes the hydroelectric power generation to ensure a sustainable power and growth of the Ghanaian economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".