Expression complementation of gene presence/absence polymorphisms in hybrids contributes importantly to heterosis in sunflower
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Numerous crops have transitioned to hybrid seed production to increase yields and yield stability through heterosis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying heterosis and its stability across environments are not yet fully understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) elucidate the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying heterosis in sunflower, and (2) determine how heterosis is maintained under different environments. METHODS: hybrid (INEDI) under both control and drought conditions and analyzed patterns of gene expression and alternative splicing. RESULTS: Thousands of PAVs were found to affect phenotypic variation using a relaxed significance threshold, and at most such loci the "absence" allele reduced values of heterotic traits, but not those of non-heterotic traits. This pattern was strengthened for PAVs that showed expression complementation in INEDI. Stop codons were much rarer than PAVs and less likely to reduce heterotic trait values. Hybrid expression patterns were enriched for the GO category, sensitivity to stimulus, but all genotypes responded to drought similarily - by up-regulating water stress response pathways and down-regulating metabolic pathways. Changes in alternative splicing were strongly negatively correlated with expression variation, implying that alternative splicing in this system largely acts to reinforce expression responses. CONCLUSION: Our results imply that complementation of expression of PAVs in hybrids is a major contributor to heterosis in sunflower, consistent with the dominance model of heterosis. This mechanism can account for yield stability across different environments. Moreover, given the much larger numbers of PAVs in plant vs. animal genomes, it also offers an explanation for the stronger heterotic responses seen in the former.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".