MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224302941 · doi:10.1002/anie.202203669

LiNbO<sub>3</sub>‐Type Polar Antiferromagnet InVO<sub>3</sub> Synthesized under High‐Pressure Conditions

2022· article· en· W4224302941 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhenhong Tan, Joey A. Lussier, Takumi Yamada, Yuanhui Xu, Takashi Saito, Masato Goto, Yoshihisa Kosugi, Dmitry Vrublevskiy, Yoshihiko Kanemitsu, Mario Bieringer, Yuichi Shimakawa

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsPolarAntiferromagnetismGround stateCondensed matter physicsMagnetic structurePolarization (electrochemistry)High pressurePerovskite (structure)Magnetic momentChemistryBixbyiteMaterials scienceCrystallographyPhase (matter)PhysicsMagnetizationAtomic physicsMagnetic fieldThermodynamicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ambient pressure cation disordered InVO 3 bixbyite has been predicted to form a GdFeO 3 ‐type perovskite phase under high pressure and high temperature. Contrary to the expectation, InVO 3 was found to crystallize in the polar LiNbO 3 ‐type structure with a calculated spontaneous polarization as large as 74 μC cm −2 . Antiferromagnetic coupling of V 3+ magnetic moments and a cooperative magnetic ground state below about 10 K coupled with a polar structure suggest an intriguing ground state of the novel LiNbO 3 ‐type high‐pressure InVO 3 structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207