MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224304772 · doi:10.4000/hybrid.1569

Quels imaginaires pour les outils numériques participatifs au musée ?

2022· article· fr· W4224304772 on OpenAlex
Éva Sandri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHybrid · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si le mouvement vers la médiation participative par le numérique rend compte d’une volonté de réactualiser les conditions de la démocratie culturelle, l’usage indifférencié de l’adjectif participatif empêche de penser le degré d’implication des individus et le travail de l’institution pour s’ouvrir à ses publics. Cet article propose d’interroger un projet participatif sur support numérique visant à valoriser la culture de la communauté des femmes gitanes d’Arles, à travers l’analyse du webdocumentaire Femmes gitanes du quai des platanes, mis en place par le Museon Arlaten (musée d’ethnographie d’Arles). Cette réflexion interroge la façon dont un musée met en place un dispositif numérique permettant de valoriser une culture en partant des initiatives de cette même communauté. Après une tentative de classement de ces types de dispositifs participatifs, l’étude de terrain proposée met en évidence un projet hybride entre les logiques top-down et bottom-up, au sein d’un dispositif participatif qui profite réellement aux participantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it