Lo scudo d’oro. Lingue e ritratti dell’alterità in una zingaresca romana del Seicento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caratteristiche del panorama culturale romano, le zingaresche sono commediole in versi rivolte a un pubblico popolare rappresentate sia in occasione di celebrazioni cittadine che di festeggiamenti privati. Nonostante godessero di un ampio successo, per molto tempo non hanno beneficiato di un’adeguata attenzione da parte degli studiosi. Il presente contributo si inserisce in una più ampia rivalutazione del teatro seicentesco intrapresa negli ultimi anni dalla critica ed ha come oggetto d’indagine Lo scudo d’oro, ovvero li dui arricchiti di Andrea della Grazia romano, zingaresca che ho recentemente scoperto in un fascicolo della biblioteca dell’Università di Harvard (Houghton Library, *IC6 A100 B670z). Lo scudo d’oro per il suo carattere plurilingue e per la peculiarità dei personaggi rappresentati può essere considerato una significativa testimonianza della Roma barocca, città cosmopolita in cui coesistevano diverse varietà linguistiche e altrettante figure sociali trasposte sulla scena teatrale attraverso le maschere della Zingara, del Norcino e del Giudeo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".