MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224305920 · doi:10.51891/rease.v8i3.4951

HÁBITOS DE HIGIENE PESSOAL NA EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL

2022· article· pt· W4224305920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Education Research
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo, descrevemos as práticas de higiene pessoal na educação infantil. O objetivo principal dessa sequência é utilizar diferentes recursos didáticos para promover a compreensão de coisas como higiene e bem-estar, para que os alunos tenham maior interação com a prática dos temas abordados, pois, através do uso de recursos adequados, os alunos são capazes de absorver a relação entre o processo de higiene e o ambiente em que vivem, e a partir daí mudar seus hábitos diários, criando uma relação direta entre o conhecimento desenvolvido em sala de aula e a prática social, podendo assim tornar-se um multiplicador de informação e ter um papel dominante no seu ambiente doméstico. Através da temática é possível observar que as crianças começam a controlar seus hábitos, a lavar as mãos ao sair do banheiro, a beber de garrafas e copos e, portanto, começam a perceber as doenças causadas pela falta de higiene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it