MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224306072 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2100016

From Structure Topology to Chemical Composition. XXX. Refinement of the Crystal Structure and Chemical Formula of Shkatulkalite, Na2Nb2Na3Ti(Si2O7)2O2(FO)(H2O)4(H2O)3, a Lamprophyllite-Group (Seidozerite Supergroup) TS-Block Mineral from the Lovozero Massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia

2022· article· en· W4224306072 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Elena Sokolova, Maxwell C. Day, F. C. Hawthorne, Fernando Cámara

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriclinic crystal systemOctahedronCrystallographyCrystal structureGroup (periodic table)Block (permutation group theory)SupergroupChemical formulaChemistryStructural formulaMaterials scienceStereochemistryMathematicsGeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Shkatulkalite, ideally Na5TiNb2(Si2O7)2O3F(H2O)7, is a lamprophyllite-group (seidozerite supergroup) TS-block mineral from the Lovozero massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia. The crystal structure of shkatulkalite was refined as triclinic, space group P, a 5.464(1), b 7.161(1), c 15.573(1) Å, α 90.00(3), β 95.75(3), γ 90.00(3)°, V 606.3(4) Å3, R1 = 7.26%. The previously given chemical analysis has been modified to better fit the crystal structure: Nb2O5 24.15, TiO2 11.35, SiO2 27.22, BaO 1.15, SrO 2.20, MnO 1.68, CaO 0.46, K2O 0.29, Na2O 14.78, H2O 15.27, F 1.61, O = F −0.68, sum 99.48 wt.%; H2O was determined from structure-refinement results. The empirical formula was calculated on 25.27 (O + F) apfu (in accord with the crystal structure): (Na1.40Sr0.19Ba0.07K0.05)Σ1.71(Na2.86Mn0.10Ca0.07)Σ3.03(Nb1.62Ti1.27Mn0.11)Σ3Si4.03O24.52H15.11F0.75, Z = 1. The ideal structural formula is as follows: Na2Nb2Na3Ti(Si2O7)2O2(FO)(H2O)4(H2O)3. The crystal structure of shkatulkalite [basic structure type B5(LG)] is a combination of a TS (titanium-silicate) block and an I (intermediate) block. The TS block consists of HOH sheets (H-heteropolyhedral, O-octahedral). The TS block exhibits linkage and stereochemistry typical for the lamprophyllite group where Ti (+ Nb + Fe3+ + Mg) = 3 apfu. The O sheet is composed of Ti-dominant MO(1) and Na-dominant MO(2,3) octahedra. In the H sheet in shkatulkalite, Si2O7 groups link to Nb-dominant MH octahedra. The AP site occurs in the plane of the H sheet and splits into AP(1) and AP(2) sites, occupied by Na at 70% and Sr (less Ba and K) at 11%. The I block consists of H2O groups. The I block of shkatulkalite is topologically identical to those in the derivative structures of kazanskyite and nechelyustovite. The structure of the lamprophyllite-group mineral shkatulkalite has a counterpart structure in the murmanite group (Ti = 4 apfu): kolskyite, ideally Na2CaTi4(Si2O7)2O4(H2O)7 [basic structure type B7(MG)]: the two structures have TS blocks of different topology and similar I blocks, mainly occupied by H2O groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207