First-principles simulations to understand the structural and electrolyte properties of idealized <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Li</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo> </mml:mo><mml:mi>Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo> </mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, researchers at the University of Waterloo (Canada) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, TN) reported a new family of lithium thioborate halide electrolytes with the composition ${\mathrm{Li}}_{7.5}{\mathrm{B}}_{10}{\mathrm{S}}_{18}{X}_{1.5}$ $(X=\mathrm{Cl}, \mathrm{Br}, \mathrm{I})$ having very impressive ionic room-temperature conductivity of magnitude $\ensuremath{\sigma}=1 \mathrm{mS}/\mathrm{cm}$. The researchers characterized the structures of the three materials in terms of a well-defined thioborate framework with a void structure containing fractionally occupied Li and X sites. The space group of the materials was identified to be monoclinic ($C2/c$, No. 15). We report the results of first-principles simulations of these materials focusing on understanding the idealized ground-state structures, the mechanisms of Li ion migration, and the overall stability of the materials. A systematic search of many possible stoichiometric crystalline configurations found ordered ground-state realizations of the materials for each of the three halides, $X=\mathrm{Cl}, \mathrm{Br}, \mathrm{I}$. Molecular dynamics simulations based on the initially ordered structures at various temperatures show significant Li ion hopping within the void channels of the structures at temperatures as low as T = 400 K. Simulations of possible decomposition products suggest that these electrolytes are also chemically stable. Overall, the simulations are consistent with the experimentally reported findings indicating that these materials are very promising solid electrolytes for possible use in solid-state Li ion batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.729 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".