MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224306311 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v11n3p32

Approximation of the Binomial Probability Function Using the Discrete Normal Distribution

2022· article· en· W4224306311 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Fraiwan Al‐Saleh, Doaa Suhail Obeidat

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBinomial approximationBinomial distributionProbability distributionNegative binomial distributionProbability mass functionApplied mathematicsBinomial (polynomial)Limit (mathematics)Characteristic function (probability theory)Measure (data warehouse)Central limit theoremApproximation errorStatisticsProbability density functionMathematical analysisComputer sciencePoisson distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method of approximating the Binomial probability function is introduced. The method is based on the discrete normal distribution. In particular, the discrete normal probability function is used to approximate the binomial probability function. The new approximation is compared with the exact values and the approximation based on Central limit theorem. The maximum absolute error of the approximation is used to measure the accuracy of the method. It turned out that this method of approximation is useful and easy to use in practice. Also, the result can be an important theoretical statistical result that can be used in educational statistics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicEducational Technology and AssessmentFrench-language works237,207