Kernel-based hierarchical structural component models for pathway analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Pathway analyses have led to more insight into the underlying biological functions related to the phenotype of interest in various types of omics data. Pathway-based statistical approaches have been actively developed, but most of them do not consider correlations among pathways. Because it is well known that there are quite a few biomarkers that overlap between pathways, these approaches may provide misleading results. In addition, most pathway-based approaches tend to assume that biomarkers within a pathway have linear associations with the phenotype of interest, even though the relationships are more complex. RESULTS: To model complex effects including non-linear effects, we propose a new approach, Hierarchical structural CoMponent analysis using Kernel (HisCoM-Kernel). The proposed method models non-linear associations between biomarkers and phenotype by extending the kernel machine regression and analyzes entire pathways simultaneously by using the biomarker-pathway hierarchical structure. HisCoM-Kernel is a flexible model that can be applied to various omics data. It was successfully applied to three omics datasets generated by different technologies. Our simulation studies showed that HisCoM-Kernel provided higher statistical power than other existing pathway-based methods in all datasets. The application of HisCoM-Kernel to three types of omics dataset showed its superior performance compared to existing methods in identifying more biologically meaningful pathways, including those reported in previous studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The HisCoM-Kernel software is freely available at http://statgen.snu.ac.kr/software/HisCom-Kernel/. The RNA-seq data underlying this article are available at https://xena.ucsc.edu/, and the others will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".