MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224314828 · doi:10.4043/32098-ms

Boosting Reaction Rate of Acids for Better Stimulation of Dolomite-Rich Formations

2022· article· en· W4224314828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Sayed, Amy Cairns, Fakuen Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolomiteDissolutionCalciteCarbonateMineralogyChemistryReaction rateHydrochloric acidGeologyChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carbonate formations are often stimulated using acid systems to enhance production rates. The reaction rate between acid and dolomite is known to be much slower than that between acid and calcite. Accordingly, for some acid fracturing treatments in dolomitic formations, it has been observed that the injected acid system could not adequately react with the rock to render desirable etching patterns on the fracture faces. This can be a direct result of the slow reactivity between dolomite-rich formations and acids. Developing an acidizing fluid that can accelerate the dissolution of dolomite will be beneficial to maximize the results of stimulation treatments in dolomite-rich formations. In the current study, advancements were made toward accelerating the reaction rate of dolomite with acids through an additive-driven chemical approach based on careful surfactant selection. Static dissolution testing of dolomite core samples in the presence of 28 wt% hydrochloric acid (HCl), both with and without additives, were performed at ambient conditions. The weight loss was calculated, and the efficiency of the added chemicals was evaluated to select the formulation for evaluation at reservoir conditions. A comprehensive reaction kinetics study was performed at a pressure of 3000 psi, across a temperature range of 175 to 350 °F. Guelph Dolomite samples were cut into 1.5" diameter by 0.5" thick disks. Powder X-Ray diffraction (PXRD) was used to determine the mineralogy and purity of the dolomite core samples. The ion concentrations in the effluent samples during the dissolution was measured by ICP in the effluent samples. Several acid/surfactant formulations were screened and characterized in the current work where several suitable surfactants were identified. It was found that the rate of dissolution of dolomite rocks in hydrochloric acids (28 wt%) could be increased by up to 30%. These results are consistent with the kinetics data collected at both 200 and 300 °F, where the rotating disk apparatus (RDA) showed that the reaction rate of dolomite with one of the developed formulations can be improved by 30 to 50% over hydrochloric acid alone. The acid/surfactant formulations developed in the current study are aqueous-based formulations. There were no incompatibilities observed after the fluid preparation. The developed acid systems showed an improvement in the dolomite and acid reaction rate which paved the road to apply these formulations in the field to improve the outcome of acid fracturing treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207